Java Web Toolkit

jwt alternatives and similar libraries

Based on the "Web Frameworks" category

• Spring

  10.0 9.9 L2 jwt VS Spring

  Provides many packages ranging from dependency injection to aspect-oriented programming to security.

• Spring Boot

  10.0 9.9 L5 jwt VS Spring Boot

  Microframework which simplifies the development of new Spring applications.

• Play

  9.6 9.6 jwt VS Play

  Uses convention over configuration, hot code reloading and display of errors in the browser.

• Blade

  8.8 6.9 L1 jwt VS Blade

  Lightweight, modular framework which aims to be elegant and simple.

• Grails

  8.3 8.8 L2 jwt VS Grails

  Groovy framework with the aim to provide a highly productive environment by favoring convention over configuration, no XML and support for mixins.

• Ninja

  7.7 6.1 L4 jwt VS Ninja

  Full stack web framework.

• Vaadin

  7.6 8.7 L2 jwt VS Vaadin

  Event-driven framework build on top of GWT. Uses server-side architecture with Ajax on the client-side.

• Ratpack

  7.4 8.4 L4 jwt VS Ratpack

  Set of libraries that facilitate fast, efficient, evolvable and well tested HTTP applications.

• PrimeFaces

  7.1 9.7 jwt VS PrimeFaces

  JSF framework which has a free and a commercial version with support. Provides several frontend components.

• Google Web Toolkit

  6.8 6.1 L1 jwt VS Google Web Toolkit

  Toolbox which includes a Java-to-JavaScript compiler for client-side code, XML parser, API for RPC, JUnit integration, internationalization support and widgets for the GUI.

• Bootique

  6.7 7.7 L4 jwt VS Bootique

  Minimally opinionated framework for runnable apps.

• Jooby

  6.0 9.6 L3 jwt VS Jooby

  Scalable, fast and modular micro framework which offers multiple programming models.

• Apache Wicket

  5.7 9.1 L3 jwt VS Apache Wicket

  Component-based web application framework similar to Tapestry with a stateful GUI.

• Pippo

  5.4 6.4 L4 jwt VS Pippo

  Small, highly modularized Sinatra-like framework.

• Takes

  5.3 8.2 jwt VS Takes

  Opinionated web framework which is build around the concepts of True Object-Oriented Programming and immutablity.

• ZK

  4.7 9.2 L1 jwt VS ZK

  ZK is a highly productive Java framework for building amazing enterprise web and mobile applications

• Firefly

  4.5 3.9 jwt VS Firefly

  Asynchronous framework for rapid development of high-performance web application.

• Baratine

  2.9 0.0 L2 jwt VS Baratine

  Toolkit for building distributed and reactive applications for multiple environments, either standalone or embedded.

• mangoo I/O

  2.7 9.1 L4 jwt VS mangoo I/O

  An Intuitive, Lightweight, High Performance Full Stack Java Web Framework.

• jetbrick-webmvc

  2.4 0.0 jwt VS jetbrick-webmvc

  jetbrick web mvc framework

• Free enterprise Java CMS

  2.3 6.1 L2 jwt VS Free enterprise Java CMS

  Free enterprise Java CMS

• Apache Tapestry

  2.2 0.0 jwt VS Apache Tapestry

  Component-oriented framework for creating dynamic, robust, highly scalable web applications.

* Code Quality Rankings and insights are calculated and provided by Lumnify.
They vary from L1 to L5 with "L5" being the highest. Visit our partner's website for more details.

Do you think we are missing an alternative of jwt or a related project?

Get to the root cause of Java performance issues with Datadog APM. 14-day free trial. More from our partner

Popular Comparisons

• jwt
  vs
  Apache Wicket
• jwt
  vs
  Jooby
• jwt
  vs
  Google Web Toolkit
• jwt
  vs
  Bootique
• jwt
  vs
  Baratine

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews More from our team